Category Archive: Scam

Apr
04
2012

OilPods Victim Wins Suit, but Might Get Nothing

A victim of OilPods, a company that sold investment opportunities in oil related investments, had won his lawsuit against the company and its sole director Mark Chang over his investment losses.

The suit was initiated in 2009 but was only decided last month.

The victim was awarded almost US$40,000 by the district judge but ironically, the legal costs that he needs to pay could easily exceed that amount.

The victim  had initiated another lawsuit against the agent who sold him the investment but that suit was dismissed with costs by the judge.

Back in 2008, Colorado-based Powder River Petroleum, had run into problems with allegations of being a ponzi scheme. This was the company that marketing agent OilPods had used to structure the oil investment opportunity.

It had then filed for bankruptcy and investors were left hanging.

Mr Chang is now an Australian permanent resident living in Perth.

Victim of Ponzi Scheme to get a Refund (Straits Times)

 

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/oilpods-victim-wins-suit-but-might-get-nothing/

Nov
18
2011

What Now for Oilpod Investors?

I received an email from someone asking about whether there were any updates on the Oilpods investment scheme.

For those who have not been following the story, Oilpods is an investment into working interests in Canadian oil wells, with monthly returns generated from the sale of the oil and gas. Eventually, it was discovered that the scheme was operated as a ponzi, and investors stopped receiving their payouts.

I did some checking for the latest news and found that in April this year, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) actually filed a suit against Brian Fox for fraud.

This comes almost two and a half years after Powder River Petroleum International was put into receivership.

SEC claims that Fox has misled the investing public by fraudulently inflating the revenue and omitting major liabilities of Powder River in Commission filings and by making other false and misleading public disclosures.

Fox has responded to the charges pleading his innocence, blaming Oilpods and the receiver for the loss of the shareholders.

Whatever the outcome, it doesn’t look like investors with Oilpods will be getting back any of their money, especially when Power River was put into liquidation and not much was recovered from them during the process.

Timeline of events:

  • December 2003: Brian Fox becomes chairman, president and CEO of Powder River Petroleum International.
  • Late 2004: Powder River begins conveying working oil and gas interests to investors in Asia for more than $43 million.
  • Mid-2007: Powder River’s guaranteed payment obligations to investors exceeds actual oil and gas production revenues.
  • December 2008: Company files for Chapter 11 protection in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Oklahoma City.
  • November 2010: Chapter 11 case is converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/what-now-for-oilpod-investors/

Oct
10
2011

Citi Asia Fined Over ex-Staff Alleged Ponzi

Came across this enforcement news about the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong giving a reprimand to Citigroup Global Markets Asia Limited (Citi Asia) as well as a fine of $6 million for failing to detect a ponzi scheme.

Apparently, a staff at Citi Asia had promised clients guaranteed returns which were fictitious. The returns were actually funded from monies from new clients.

As a result of a failure on the part of Citi Asia to report the incident as soon as it was discovered (they only did so after the investigation had ended), the ex-staff concerned had time to flee the country before SFC could step in.

The supervisor in charge of the staff has also been suspended by SFC for her failure to check on several red flags bought to her attention.

However, it is not all dark and gloomy for the investors. The good news for the affected clients was that all their losses would be compensated by Citi Asia.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/citi-asia-fined-over-ex-staff-alleged-ponzi/

Oct
07
2011

Boiler Room Fraudsters Taken to Task

Seven men who were involved in a boiler room scam that cheated investors of millions of dollars over a two year span were sentenced to a total of forty years in jail.

The Spanish-based operation targeted thousands of investors in the UK by applying high pressure telemarketing techniques to push shares in a bio-diesel company, Worldwide Bio Refineries (WBR).

The modus operandi was similar to other scams that tries to sell fake shares through telemarketing like Nexus Ventures.

WBR itself was a shell company that was set up to look like a legitimate business. However, it did had a plant in Singapore producing diesel intended to be marketed in the UK.

One of the men who was convicted, Dennis Potter, lived in Singapore during the time the scam was ongoing in 2005 and 2006.

Nothing was mentioned in the SFO report about whether the money was ultimately recovered, but seeing how the money was systematically transferred to offshore accounts, I am not optimistic.

With an average of 5-6 years in jail (even less after parole), the fraudsters might not need to work for the rest of their lives after being released if they had managed to stash away their money safely before their arrest.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/boiler-room-fraudsters-taken-to-task/

Aug
17
2011

Court Rules on Madoff Losses

In an appeal ruling, the court has affirmed the method of determining how much investors can recover of their money lost in the Madoff ponzi scheme.

Fictitious profits would not be counted as monies to be returned to investors. Only the original capital should be counted in determining how much money is owed to investors.

Earlier investors who had redeemed their investments with profits would need to return their profits.

If this kind of approach is taken for the various scams that had occurred in Singapore, those early investors would have needed to return their profits.  This will put a strong deterrent on people who invest into schemes knowing that they are Ponzi like in nature. But I think this is something that will never happen here.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/court-rules-on-madoff-losses/

Older posts «