Category Archive: Structured Products

Mar
29
2011

Lehman Hong Kong Minibond Holders to Get Significant Payout

Lehman Brothers Minibond holders in Hong Kong have plenty to cheer about.

They (whether young or old, educated or uneducated) have been offered better compensation terms of at least 70% to 93% of their money back, receiver PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP said. After adding in an additional ex gratia payment from banks, the total payout will range from 85% to 96.5% for investors.

An earlier offer made in July 2009 was only for a 60% payout.

A group of Hong Kong investors have rejected the offer, saying they want 100% compensation.

In Singapore, investors who did not get any form of resolution with FIDReC had to settle for the residue value of the underlying Minibonds. This ranged from 21.5% to 70%, depending on the series of the Minibond note.

Taking into account those who did complain to FIDReC, about 12% of Minibond holders would have received back their full principal, 68% received partial settlement (of 50% or more), and the other 20% receiving less than 50% of their principal.

For the other structured products like DBS High Notes 5, Merrill Lynch Jubilee and a number of the Pinnacle notes, the people who did not managed to get any resolution via FIDRec (majority of them) would get back nothing (or next to nothing) as the residue value of the underlying notes was almost worthless.

Lehman Minibond Investors Offered Higher Payout After Hong Kong Protests (Bloomberg)

More Lehman Minibond Money on the Table (South China Morning Post)

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/lehman-hong-kong-minibond-holders-to-get-significant-payout/

Dec
30
2010

Pinnacle Notes 2 Default

It has been more than two years since the collapse of Lehman Brothers that triggered a mass default of structured notes sold in Singapore.

Even up to today, some investors who thought they had bought into “safe” investment products are discovering the ugly truth behind the products they had been sold.

Just two weeks ago, Morgan Stanley announced that their Pinnacle Notes 2, a credit-linked note, is likely to go into mandatory redemption.

When that happens, investors of the note will lose a significant part of their capital.

With the outcome of all cases that were settled with Fidrec kept confidential and MAS’s stance of not publishing regulatory actions of a private nature, it is no surprise that affected investors are finding it hard to decide on their course of action.

It tells a lot when people prefer to go to forums to seek advice from strangers rather than approach our regulators.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/pinnacle-2-default/

Dec
14
2010

DBS High Notes Suit Dismissed

215 investors of DBS High Notes 5 who lost their money in the complex instrument had their suit against DBS dismissed by High Court Judge Lee Seiu Kin.

The investors had argued that there were inconsistencies in the product’s base prospectus and pricing statement.

Justice Lee agreed with DBS that three of the formulas used by them were completely consistent. While there was a mistake in the fourth, he accepted DBS’s explanation that it was due to an obvious clerical error.

If “clerical mistake” can be used as a defence to wrong information printed on a prospectus, will we ever believe in whatever documents we are given anymore?

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/dbs-high-notes-suit-dismissed/

Aug
27
2010

CIMB Max InvestSave Structured Deposit

Someone asked me about the CIMB Max InvestSave Structured Deposit.

This is a long term (15 or 25 years) structured deposit that can give you equity-like returns via exposure to the CIMB Evergreen II Index.

The CIMB Evergreen II Index tracks a wide range of markets across major economic regions and asset classes which adopts a Risk/Return Optimisation strategy by finding the best possible asset class allocations to maximise returns with controlled volatility (Standard Deviation) of around 10%.

It also adopts a Long/Short strategy which proactively trades when markets are bullish or bearish.

The Max InvestSave brochure gives some projections of the returns.

Do not let yourself be swayed by the higher projections because ultimately, your final returns will be dependent on the performance of the CIMB Evergreen II index (which is not guaranteed). Note that the index has a 2% annual management fee and there is also a 5% performance fee.

The investment is 100% protected if held to maturity so if the index does not perform, you will end up with your original invested sum. If you add in the bonus units (given during the promotion now), the annualized returns works out to be about 0.9% p.a.

If you look at the CIMB Evergreen II Factsheet, you can see that the historical returns seems to be quite impressive. It managed to return 13.15% even in 2008 when the market was down severely. However, the returns for 2009 was more muted at 2.36%.

I would treat the returns of the index with a huge pinch of salt. There was a similar product launched in Malaysia and the performance has been downhill ( click to see chart) ever since it was launched in October 2008. There was a big negative return for 2009 even when the equity markets rallied quite heavily. That product was already tracking the CIMB Evergreen Index I so I wonder why CIMB had to use a separate index specially just for this.

Are these backtested numbers or actual historical performance?

Another feature of this product is a performance lock-in feature built in which guarantees the returns based on the highest market price achieved during the product lifespan if held to maturity. While this is a nice feature to have, note that it does not come free as CIMB will have to find some way to guarantee this return.

I’m not too sure how they do it but one way it can be done is to allocation a higher proportion of the assets to fixed income as a higher price is achieved. This might cap reduce future upside of the index.

One fund that has a similar lock-in benefit that was launched in the past was the AXA Secure Ascent 2020. Unfortunately, it was launched at a very bad time in April 2008 before the market collapsed. The fund was designed to be a 12-year investment giving moderate exposure to equities but because of the market collapse, it now has an allocation of almost 90% to fixed income with the remaining 10% in leveraged equities.

The high fixed income allocation is necessary is in order to give the guaranteed maturity return of 1.00455 based on the lock-in price (current price is about 0.96287). I think investors in the Secure Ascent 2020 fund might see limited upside potential from now till the fund matures in 2020.

Overall, the CIMB Max InvestSave structured deposit is a product that I will not invest in.

You also need to mind in mind the worst case scenario which is if CIMB goes bust as a structured deposit does not fall under the protection of the Singapore Deposit Insurance Scheme.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/cimb-max-investsave-structured-deposit/

Aug
26
2010

MAS Lifts Structured Notes Ban on Six Financial Institutions

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said it will lift the ban on the sale of structured notes for CIMB Securities, DMG & Partners Securities, Kim Eng Securities, OCBC Securities, UOB Kay Hian and Phillip Securities with immediate effect.

Previously, these institutions had been banned by MAS from selling structured notes for a year.

MAS Lifts Ban (MAS announcement)

MAS Lifts Notes Ban on Six Institutions (Today)

Six financial institutions can resume selling structured notes (CNA)

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/mas-lifts-structured-notes-ban-on-six-financial-institutions/

Older posts «

» Newer posts