Category Archive: Structured Products

Jul
16
2010

DBS HK Compensates HK$651m to Clients Who Bought Lehman-linked Notes

Hong Kong authorities have come to an agreement with DBS HK on the amount of compensation to customers who bought Lehman-Link notes structured by DBS. $651 million Hong Kong dollars or about S$115 million will be paid out to some clients who bought these products.

The 2160 low risk customers who accept the resolution scheme will receive their full investment back together with interest. The rest who have a higher risk profile will have their cases reviewed on a case by case basis.

In Singapore, some DBS customers were sold a product High Notes 5 that lost all its value when Lehman Brothers went under. According to a July 2009 MAS report, a total of $103.7 million worth of HN5 were sold to 1,083 retail clients between 30 March and 30 April 2007.

These investors were not so lucky as their Hong Kong counterparts when it comes to compensation. Even though all of them had their cases reviewed individually, the amount of compensation DBS paid out to them amounts to only S$7.8 million out of their original investment of S$84.1 million.

DBS HK unit agrees to pay HK$651m to clients who bought Lehman-linked notes (Channel News Asia)

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/dbs-hk-compensates-hk651m-to-clients-who-bought-lehman-linked-notes/

Jun
24
2010

Difference Between Traditional and Structured Deposits

In this second My Money seminar (held in Feb 2009), Frances Chan from The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) covered the difference between traditional and structured deposits.

Here’s a summary of her presentation.

There are three types of traditional deposits, namely: Transactional, Special Savings and Fixed/Time Deposits. The financial crisis in 2008 saw many of us asking the same question: How safe is my money?

For both traditional and structured deposits, you are exposed to the default risk of the bank.

For traditional deposits, your money is also protected by deposit insurance (up to $20,000 per individual) and fully covered by the Singapore Government Guarantee (till end of 2010). More information the deposit insurance scheme can be found on the Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation website.

Structured deposits are issued by the bank and are not to be confused with traditional deposits. They offer protection of principal with potentially higher returns than traditional deposits but are not risk free. Your money is usually invested in 2 components – Bonds or money market instruments and also linked to exposure of different underlying assets/markets in order to have a potential of additional upside.

If the underlying assets do not perform as expected, you may receive just your principal upon maturity which mean you would be worse off compared to just leaving the money in a traditional deposits.

Features of structured deposits include the following:

  • Tenors: Structured deposits have maturity periods lasting from a year up to 10 years. When investing, the main consideration you should consider is the length of time you are able to set aside for investing and whether the issuer has the option to redeem the deposit early.
  • Principal protection
  • Offer period: They are offered in tranches which has either a fixed offer period or are available til the tranche is fully subscribed.
  • Investment returns: It is important to note the maximum/minimum returns of the product, how returns are linked to the underlying asset/markets and the worse case scenario.
  • Other features: Option for early withdrawal and the various costs involved.

Benefits of Structured deposits include the following:

  • Diversify risks and enhance yields
  • Offers potentially higher returns
  • Exposure to assets/markets not easily accessible by retail investors
  • Protection of principal

However, they are accompanied by various risks:

  • Liquidity risks: Investing funds in structured deposits usually ties up your funds for a period of time. An early withdrawal may result in the loss of part of your returns and/or principal.
  • Issuer risks: Are you comfortable with the credit standing of the bank offering these structured deposits?
  • Market risks: Structured deposits are linked to underlying assets/markets, hence their performance are determined by the performance of these underlyings.
  • Reinvestment risks: Where the issuer is allowed to exercise the early redemption option, you may be exposed to the risk of having to invest your money at a lower rate compared to when you first invested and the maximum returns received may also be capped.

Whether an individual chooses a structured or traditional deposit depends on his/her risk profile and preferences. Traditional as well as structured deposits both have their roles to play as key parts of a well-diversified portfolio.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/difference-between-traditional-and-structured-deposits/

May
11
2010

Pinnacle Notes Lawsuit

The latest indicative price of Pinnacle 6 and 7 is 0.01% ($1 for every $10000) and investors in them are looking at a 99.99% capital loss very soon.

Someone asked me the lawsuit for the Pinnacle Notes and I thought it would be good to post this for everyone:

“I am one of the victims of Morgan Stanley scam. May I know where u read that Kirby Mcinerney is going to take up class action against MS? May I also know who is tkla.km@gmail.com? After being scammed once,can’t help being cautious. Thank you for posting the info.”

I have included a couple of videos below to explain how it works. Remember, Kirby Mcinerney only get paid if they win.

This is another contact person if you want to find out more about this:

Contact Person for Kigby Mcinerney Pinnacle Lawsuit


1) What does your firm do for Asian investors?
2) What rights to Asian investors have in a US court?
3) What results have Asian investors received/could receive in a US court?
4) Are these cases worth it financially given the time involved in reaching a resolution?
5) Do you expect more cases to be brought?
6) Is fraud on the rise? In what sectors? In what ways?
7) What kind of regulation will prevent the fraud that has been committed?


Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/pinnacle-notes-lawsuit/

May
04
2010

Should MAS Act?

In the past couple of years, many claims were made by investors who bought structured products which had collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) embedded in them.

Recently, it was reported that Goldman Sachs was being charged by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with fraud in some of their CDO deals. In addition, some other banks might also be investigated.

In view of the developments in the US, someone wrote in to the Straits Times forum to ask whether MAS would be doing its own investigations into the troubled CDOs that were sold here.

The reply from MAS mentioned that MAS would take regulatory action where there is a breach but leaves it open whether it would be doing any investigations.

I refer to “Should MAS act?” (ST Forum, 24 April 2010).

Entities offering securities to the public in Singapore are required to comply with the Securities and Futures Act which, among other things, requires proper disclosure of the features and risks of the product. Where there is a breach of regulation or law, MAS will take appropriate regulatory action. MAS also monitors developments in various jurisdictions. However, not all developments in other jurisdictions will be equally applicable in Singapore.

Angelina Fernandez
Director (Communications)
Monetary Authority of Singapore

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/should-mas-act/

Apr
19
2010

Pinnacle Notes Legal Action

A US law firm, Kirby McInerney, has spoken about possible legal action that can be taken in US Courts in connection with the Pinnacle Notes.

Some investors have already expressed interest to join this action but the law firm needs more members to take part before they can proceed. There is no upfront fee involved to join the suit. Investors will only need to pay Kirby McInerney if they are successful in their law suit and the fee will be based on a percentage of the money recovered from the financial institution that is being sued.

Investors of Pinnacle Notes who are interested to join the suit or need more information can send an e-mail to tkla.km@gmail.com providing the following information:

  • your name
  • mobile phone
  • email address
  • amount invested
  • type of Pinnacle Notes (which series)

As I understand, the law suit is not against the distributor of the Pinnacle Notes so those who have already settled on a partial compensation with their distributor would still be able to join.

Permanent link to this article: http://www.martinlee.sg/pinnacle-notes-legal-action/

Older posts «

» Newer posts