Leave a Comment:
16 comments
Hi
Interesting comments. could someone refer me to an IFA who can perhaps provide alternative switching for unit trusts -at low or very minimal switching fees and a nominal wrap fee? Thanks
I think there is no way any investor can be better off staying with FSM, since the platform fee is charged on the entire portfolio and the discounted sales charge is only on the purchase amount. Maybe if they do not have any sales charge, that might even things up for investors.
I figure only investors who do an aweful lot of switching may benefit as they may exceed the free switches limit.
From the changes they have recently implemented and say they will implement, I think FSM has realised they probably made a booboo.
ReplyI am half way out from FSM too. However, I am still very curious why they are introducing this fee. Being an established fund distributor, I supposed they must have assessed the impact of implementing such fee. Seriously, I doubt there are a lot of people who are willing to pay this fee.
Being an financial intermediary, it does not make sense to chase your customers away. The lesser the number of customers, the lower the economies of scale. The fund managers may also find it less attractive to sell their funds through this distributor when there are lesser customers. No matter how I look at it, it is still a lose-lose situation to implement this fee.
ReplyHi Robert,
Personally, I think it’s a very bad business decision.
ReplyI wonder if Fundsupermart will reverse their decision, if many many clients ask them how to transfer out their fund holdings.
ReplyA lot of backlash actually.
Almost 300 posts in 3 days.
https://secure.fundsupermart.com/main/community/forumPosts.svdo?page=20&pid=002156
Replyit is a fee charged on current holdings even if you don’t buy or sell for the entire year.
ReplySo the platform fees have to be paid only when you buy or sell or
even for holding your current holdings
It’s charged on your holdings even if you don’t buy or sell anything.
Accrued daily but deducted quarterly.
ReplyThis appears to be a result of the investors who did not bother to check what they were buying in the minibomb saga. I guess this is the response to all those complains to MAS.
ReplyI think another issue that has been overshadowed by FSM wrap fee is the reasons that FSM has given, specifically the rising costs of staying in compliance with MAS new regulation. Amongst one of those imminent soon-to-be-introduced regulations is one that requires some kind of “customer knowledge test”. It seems that a 3rd party would determine if the customers are saavy/educated/smart enough to be granted access to various investment instruments. As an IFA, I don’t suppose you have learnt about this and how it is going to affect investments in Singapore?
Personally, I find that proposed regulation a joke and I hope it doesn’t turn into law! How ridiculous is it? I must pass an exam to invest my own money???
ReplyHi Garrett,
that was actually mentioned in an earlier consultation paper. See paragraph 4. You can read the consultation paper for the full details.
ReplyThis is only a one time cost and should not be a good reason for FSM to impose a recurring fee.
Reply