Leave a Comment:
4 comments
It is very simple. Now that they hired that FT, he has to come out with something good to justify his existence. What can be better than having a positive spin and advertising it without the need to honor it in practice. To them all cash flow is divided into expense and income. When you trade with them, you are giving them income. When they rebate you, that is an expense. Since their statistics showed that amalgation of trades are rare so how great is it to look on paper to be giving out rebates and bringing in the customers(income) yet at the same time not really giving out the rebates(expense). That is how that FT justify his income.
Replythat should not be the case.
i still don’t understand why they laid down this stupid condition.
Replyjust split your order into 2 and it will be considered as an amalgamated trade.
ReplyJust wondering whether they might charge double commissions for amalgamated trades and then give the rebate!
Reply