Leave a Comment:
1 comment
The alignment part is obvious corporate relations talk on the CEO’s part, commically contradictory, but ultimately of no consequence.
While I can understand the frustrations of existing unitholders over the stagnant unit prices, it makes no sense to charge that a 5-6k lots sell off of management units every 3 months is the cause of percieved unsatisfactory price performance. These units hardly amount to a single day’s trading volume. Institutuional buying & selling discretions would have a larger magnitude on pricing.
Unitholders would be better off querying the potential hangover effects of ORQ/MBFC income support expiry, details of Suntec City’s makeover and/or debt renewal risks in the next few years while the fund undergoes a delicate transformation of its jewel assets.
I believe investors should be more concerned with these issues than wasting time over such trivial matters.
Reply